Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/134298
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe cosmopolitanization of trade regions: Global trends and implications, 1965-1990
dc.contributor.authorPoon, J.P.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-20T08:45:40Z
dc.date.available2016-12-20T08:45:40Z
dc.date.issued1997-10
dc.identifier.citationPoon, J.P. (1997-10). The cosmopolitanization of trade regions: Global trends and implications, 1965-1990. Economic Geography 73 (4) : 390-404. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00130095
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/134298
dc.description.abstractPostwar international trade relations are built on multilateral free trade principles that regard regional trade coalitions as suboptimal arrangements. A rising share of international trade, however, appears to be occurring within regions, raising the fear that the world economy is disintegrating into inward-looking trading blocs. Such fears are now being challenged because the regionalization of world trade is said to be a "natural" process strongly influenced by geographic proximity. Furthermore, prevailing regionalization is taking place in a context of stronger global linkages. This paper examines global regionalization tendencies by tracing trade interactions from 1965 to 1990 and finds a trend toward a less spatially fragmented world economy. Five dominant trade regions may be identified in 1990 as compared to eight smaller regions in 1965. The regions have become more geographically oriented, with the majority of members associated with the regional cores of Japan, Germany, and the United States. Greater regionalization, however, need not contradict multilateralism. By examining the time-trends of each region's propensity to trade extraregionally, I show that regions have also increased their inclination to trade a larger share of their gross domestic product with the rest of the world. This suggests that the world economy is increasingly characterized by regional cosmopolitanism and may not disintegrate into isolated trading blocs.
dc.subjectExtraregionalization
dc.subjectImperfect competition
dc.subjectIntegrated networks
dc.subjectRegional cosmopolitanism
dc.subjectRegionalization
dc.subjectScale economies
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentSOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES
dc.description.sourcetitleEconomic Geography
dc.description.volume73
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page390-404
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.