Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1086/420902
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMultinational corporations, patenting, and knowledge flow: The case of Singapore
dc.contributor.authorHu, A.G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-13T05:30:55Z
dc.date.available2016-12-13T05:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2004-07
dc.identifier.citationHu, A.G. (2004-07). Multinational corporations, patenting, and knowledge flow: The case of Singapore. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (4) : 781-800. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/420902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/420902</a>
dc.identifier.issn00130079
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/132302
dc.description.abstractThere has been an increase in the incidence of multinational corporations (MNCs) conducting research and development (R&D) in their overseas subsidiaries. 1 In deciding where to locate R&D activity, MNCs factor into consideration different forces that influence the costs and benefits of R&D. Using patent citations data and corporate information collected from various sources, I seek to answer two questions. First, is the R&D that MNCs carry out in their Singapore subsidiaries qualitatively different from that conducted in their headquarters? Second, does the R&D activity of the MNCs' subsidiaries facilitate knowledge flow from MNCs to the local Singaporean inventors? To answer the first question, I use a number of citations-based measures to compare the technological significance of patents taken out by MNCs' Singapore subsidiaries and their other patents. I take two steps to investigate the second question. There are no citations made by local Singaporean inventors to patents invented by MNCs' Singaporean inventors - not surprising given the extremely smaller numbers of patents of the two groups. Instead I focus on citations from local Singaporean inventors to patents that were taken out by MNCs having a subsidiary in Singapore but that were invented elsewhere. I first compare the frequency of a Singapore local patent citing a non-Singaporean MNC patent with that of a random rest-of-the-world patent citing such a patent - controlling for differences resulting from the technological area and the age of patents. The exercise is carried out for both random developing country and OECD country patents. I then use a probit model to examine whether the incidence of local Singaporean patents citing non-Singaporean MNC patents is related to the number of patents MNCs' Singapore subsidiaries take out. © 2004 by The University of Chigaco. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/420902
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentECONOMICS
dc.description.doi10.1086/420902
dc.description.sourcetitleEconomic Development and Cultural Change
dc.description.volume52
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page781-800
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.