Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1086/420902
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Multinational corporations, patenting, and knowledge flow: The case of Singapore | |
dc.contributor.author | Hu, A.G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-13T05:30:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-13T05:30:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hu, A.G. (2004-07). Multinational corporations, patenting, and knowledge flow: The case of Singapore. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (4) : 781-800. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/420902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/420902</a> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 00130079 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/132302 | |
dc.description.abstract | There has been an increase in the incidence of multinational corporations (MNCs) conducting research and development (R&D) in their overseas subsidiaries. 1 In deciding where to locate R&D activity, MNCs factor into consideration different forces that influence the costs and benefits of R&D. Using patent citations data and corporate information collected from various sources, I seek to answer two questions. First, is the R&D that MNCs carry out in their Singapore subsidiaries qualitatively different from that conducted in their headquarters? Second, does the R&D activity of the MNCs' subsidiaries facilitate knowledge flow from MNCs to the local Singaporean inventors? To answer the first question, I use a number of citations-based measures to compare the technological significance of patents taken out by MNCs' Singapore subsidiaries and their other patents. I take two steps to investigate the second question. There are no citations made by local Singaporean inventors to patents invented by MNCs' Singaporean inventors - not surprising given the extremely smaller numbers of patents of the two groups. Instead I focus on citations from local Singaporean inventors to patents that were taken out by MNCs having a subsidiary in Singapore but that were invented elsewhere. I first compare the frequency of a Singapore local patent citing a non-Singaporean MNC patent with that of a random rest-of-the-world patent citing such a patent - controlling for differences resulting from the technological area and the age of patents. The exercise is carried out for both random developing country and OECD country patents. I then use a probit model to examine whether the incidence of local Singaporean patents citing non-Singaporean MNC patents is related to the number of patents MNCs' Singapore subsidiaries take out. © 2004 by The University of Chigaco. All rights reserved. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/420902 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | ECONOMICS | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1086/420902 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Economic Development and Cultural Change | |
dc.description.volume | 52 | |
dc.description.issue | 4 | |
dc.description.page | 781-800 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | NOT_IN_WOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.