Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Modalities of surveillance in treated nasopharyngeal cancer||Authors:||Chao, S.-S.
|Issue Date:||Jul-2003||Citation:||Chao, S.-S., Loh, K.-S., Tan, L.K.S. (2003-07). Modalities of surveillance in treated nasopharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 129 (1) : 61-64. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00485-6||Abstract:||OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy of different modalities in the detection of disease during the early posttreatment period of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We prospectively evaluated 57 patients with NPC who were treated with radiation. A postnasal space (PNS) biopsy, an endoscopic examination, and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed 4 months after treatment. RESULTS: Four patients had evidence of disease in the PNS biopsy specimen. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the endoscopic examination were 75%, 94.3%, 50%, and 98%, respectively, while those of the CT scan were 50%, 49.1%, 6.9%, and 92.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the early postradiation period for patients with NPC, an endoscopic examination is a suitable surveillance modality, but routine CT scanning has no added clinical benefit. SIGNIFICANCE: When an endoscopic examination of the PNS yields normal results, a biopsy is not necessary because the likelihood of disease is low.||Source Title:||Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/131357||ISSN:||01945998||DOI:||10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00485-6|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Aug 6, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jul 29, 2020
checked on Jul 31, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.