Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Understanding immersivity: Image generation and transformation processes in 3D immersive environments||Authors:||Kozhevnikov, M.
Three-dimensional immersive virtual environments
|Issue Date:||2012||Citation:||Kozhevnikov, M., Dhond, R.P. (2012). Understanding immersivity: Image generation and transformation processes in 3D immersive environments. Frontiers in Psychology 3 (AUG) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00284||Abstract:||Most research on three-dimensional (3D) visual-spatial processing has been conducted using traditional non-immersive 2D displays. Here we investigated how individuals generate and transform mental images within 3D immersive (3DI) virtual environments, in which the viewers perceive themselves as being surrounded by a 3D world. In Experiment 1, we compared participants' performance on the Shepard and Metzler (1971) mental rotation (MR) task across the following three types of visual presentation environments; traditional 2D non-immersive (2DNI), 3D non-immersive (3DNI anaglyphic glasses), and 3DI (head mounted display with position and head orientation tracking). In Experiment 2, we examined how the use of different backgrounds affected MR processes within the 3DI environment. In Experiment 3, we compared electroencephalogram data recorded while participants were mentally rotating visual-spatial images presented in 3DI vs. 2DNI environments. Overall, the findings of the three experiments suggest that visual-spatial processing is different in immersive and non-immersive environments, and that immersive environments may require different image encoding and transformation strategies than the two other non-immersive environments. Specifically, in a non-immersive environment, participants may utilize a scene-based frame of reference and allocentric encoding whereas immersive environments may encourage the use of a viewer-centered frame of reference and egocentric encoding. These findings also suggest that MR performed in laboratory conditions using a traditional 2D computer screen may not reflect spatial processing as it would occur in the real world. © 2012 Kozhevnikov and Dhond.||Source Title:||Frontiers in Psychology||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/128590||ISSN:||16641078||DOI:||10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00284|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.