Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.008
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAnti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH
dc.contributor.authorLan, V.T.N.
dc.contributor.authorLinh, N.K.
dc.contributor.authorTuong, H.M.
dc.contributor.authorWong, P.C.
dc.contributor.authorHowles, C.M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-07T03:09:59Z
dc.date.available2016-09-07T03:09:59Z
dc.date.issued2013-10
dc.identifier.citationLan, V.T.N., Linh, N.K., Tuong, H.M., Wong, P.C., Howles, C.M. (2013-10). Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 27 (4) : 390-399. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.008
dc.identifier.issn14726483
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/126991
dc.description.abstractThis pilot study compared the efficacy and safety of two simple dosing algorithms, one based on anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) and the other on the antral follicle count (AFC), to determine the starting dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in 348 women. Patients were randomized to a predefined AMH-or AFC-based algorithm. The proportion of cycles with the desired response was similar when rFSH dose was determined using AMH or AFC (35.2% versus 28.4%). There was a significant difference between the groups in the proportion of cycles with a hyperresponse (8.6% and 17.4%, but the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was similar (1.1% and 4.6%). There were no significant differences between two groups in outcomes, including implantation (19.3% versus 19.0%), clinical pregnancy (38.0% versus 46.9%), multiple pregnancy (16.5% versus 15.2%) and miscarriage (7.0% versus 8.3%). However, statistically significant differences in ovarian response were evident among the AMH and AFC subgroups: for AMH, Desired and Hypo; for AFC, Hypo and Hyper. This pilot study provides information for developing protocols to further validate the use of either AMH or AFC to guide the starting dose of rFSH in ovarian stimulation. © 2013, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.008
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnti-Müllerian hormone
dc.subjectAntral follicle count
dc.subjectAssisted reproduction technology
dc.subjectFSH
dc.subjectOvarian stimulation
dc.subjectRandomized study
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentOBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.008
dc.description.sourcetitleReproductive BioMedicine Online
dc.description.volume27
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page390-399
dc.description.codenRBOEA
dc.identifier.isiut000325098200009
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.