Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S13671
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Hormonal therapeutics enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) post-docetaxel-an indirect comparison | |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, P.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Haaland, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Montero, A.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kyriakopoulos, C.E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lopes, G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-06T03:00:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-06T03:00:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-03-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tan, P.S., Haaland, B., Montero, A.J., Kyriakopoulos, C.E., Lopes, G. (2014-03-16). Hormonal therapeutics enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) post-docetaxel-an indirect comparison. Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology 8 : 29-36. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S13671 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 11795549 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/126501 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: This study aims to make an indirect comparison between enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate for mCRPC post-docetaxel. Methods: A search for published phase 3 trials was performed with PubMed. Indirect comparisons of enzalutamide (AFFIRM) to abiraterone acetate (COU-AA-301) on outcomes overall survival (OS), time to prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) progression, radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), and PSA response were constructed in the context of log-linear regression models. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07). However, there was some evidence that enzalutamide may outperform abiraterone acetate with respect to secondary outcomes: time to PSA progression (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.53), radiographic PFS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.74), and PSA response rates (RRs) (OR 10.69, 95% CI 3.92-29.20). Conclusion: While there was no statistically significant difference in OS, enzalutamide may be advantageous for secondary endpoints. Findings of this indirect comparison serve to be hypothesis-generating for future head-to-head trials. © the authors. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S13671 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Abiraterone acetate | |
dc.subject | Enzalutamide | |
dc.subject | mCRPC | |
dc.subject | Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer | |
dc.subject | Post-docetaxel | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | DUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE | |
dc.description.doi | 10.4137/CMO.S13671 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology | |
dc.description.volume | 8 | |
dc.description.page | 29-36 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000215745000004 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.