Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12272
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGlobal health and emergency care: A resuscitation research agenda - Part 2
dc.contributor.authorHock Ong, M.E.
dc.contributor.authorAufderheide, T.P.
dc.contributor.authorNichol, G.
dc.contributor.authorBobrow, B.J.
dc.contributor.authorBossaert, L.
dc.contributor.authorCameron, P.
dc.contributor.authorFinn, J.
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, I.
dc.contributor.authorKoster, R.W.
dc.contributor.authorMcNally, B.
dc.contributor.authorNg, Y.Y.
dc.contributor.authorShin, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorSopko, G.
dc.contributor.authorTanaka, H.
dc.contributor.authorIwami, T.
dc.contributor.authorHauswald, M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-06T02:59:58Z
dc.date.available2016-09-06T02:59:58Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationHock Ong, M.E., Aufderheide, T.P., Nichol, G., Bobrow, B.J., Bossaert, L., Cameron, P., Finn, J., Jacobs, I., Koster, R.W., McNally, B., Ng, Y.Y., Shin, S.D., Sopko, G., Tanaka, H., Iwami, T., Hauswald, M. (2013-12). Global health and emergency care: A resuscitation research agenda - Part 2. Academic Emergency Medicine 20 (12) : 1297-1303. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12272
dc.identifier.issn10696563
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/126497
dc.description.abstractAt the 2013 Academic Emergency Medicine global health consensus conference, a breakout session to develop a research agenda for resuscitation was held. Two articles are the result of that discussion. This second article addresses data collection, management, and analysis and regionalization of postresuscitation care, resuscitation programs, and research examples around the world and proposes a strategy to strengthen resuscitation research globally. There is a need for reliable global statistics on resuscitation, international standardization of data, and development of an electronic standard for reporting data. Regionalization of postresuscitation care is a priority area for future research. Large resuscitation clinical research networks are feasible and can give valuable data for improvement of service and outcomes. Low-cost models of population-based research, and emphasis on interventional and implementation studies that assess the clinical effects of programs and interventions, are needed to determine the most cost-effective strategies to improve outcomes. The global challenge is how to adapt research findings to a developing world situation to have an effect internationally. © 2013 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12272
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE
dc.description.doi10.1111/acem.12272
dc.description.sourcetitleAcademic Emergency Medicine
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.page1297-1303
dc.description.codenAEMEF
dc.identifier.isiut000328566800013
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.