Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12089
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMandarins versus machiavellians? On differences between work motivations of administrative and political elites
dc.contributor.authorVan Der Wal, Z.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-02T04:37:31Z
dc.date.available2016-06-02T04:37:31Z
dc.date.issued2013-09
dc.identifier.citationVan Der Wal, Z. (2013-09). Mandarins versus machiavellians? On differences between work motivations of administrative and political elites. Public Administration Review 73 (5) : 749-759. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12089
dc.identifier.issn00333352
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124919
dc.description.abstractThis article explores how work motivations differ between administrative and political elites, based on 94 qualitative interviews conducted in the Netherlands, European Union, and United States. Both elite groups are primarily motivated in their initial choice of public service by wanting to contribute to, serve, or improve society; job content, career opportunities, political ideals, and personal background are also important motivators. Once in public service, serving society remains important, but politicians differ from public managers in that they want to have a big impact and bring about actual societal change, and they consider themselves best equipped to do so, whereas the latter value intellectually stimulating work more than anything else. Motivational categories for both groups are relatively stable across institutional settings. Theorizing on the results, the author offers seven propositions for future research. This article contributes to the research on motivation in the public domain by using qualitative methodology and including politicians. © 2013 by The American Society for Public Administration.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12089
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentLEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY
dc.description.doi10.1111/puar.12089
dc.description.sourcetitlePublic Administration Review
dc.description.volume73
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page749-759
dc.identifier.isiut000324390400017
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Nov 30, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
checked on Nov 23, 2021

Page view(s)

81
checked on Dec 2, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.