Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2010-009
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDisrupting hegemonic liberalism in East Asia
dc.contributor.authorChua, B.H.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-01T10:23:05Z
dc.date.available2016-06-01T10:23:05Z
dc.date.issued2010-06
dc.identifier.citationChua, B.H. (2010-06). Disrupting hegemonic liberalism in East Asia. Boundary 2 37 (2) : 199-216. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2010-009
dc.identifier.issn01903659
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124603
dc.description.abstractBy the end of the twentieth century, it was conventional, among social and political theory circles in developed countries of the West, to assume that a liberal capitalist democracy would be the endpoint of political economic development. However, this hegemonic desire of liberalism has been frustrated by the apparent inability of liberalism to take root despite rapid capitalist economic development in East Asia. This is partly because the countries in East Asia are newly minted nations that emerged after the end of the Second World War and were immediately plunged into the cold war. Under cold war conditions, as long as the countries were anticommunist, authoritarian excesses of the governments of the new nations were condoned. This provided opportunities for political and economic developments in East Asia that were alternatives to the historically determined liberal capitalist democracies of the United States and Europe. Three alternatives are notable: the development of a very significant state capitalist sector in the economy; the modification of democratic electoral procedures and ideology to emphasize trust in government instead of representation; and, motivated by the perceived need to avoid community corrosive liberalism, a development of communitarian ideology. As these developments consolidate, and the social and economic benefits become obvious to the citizenry, the likelihood that East Asian nations will adopt the standard form of liberal capitalist democracy recedes. © 2010 by Duke University Press.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2010-009
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentSOCIOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1215/01903659-2010-009
dc.description.sourcetitleBoundary 2
dc.description.volume37
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page199-216
dc.identifier.isiut000279642700009
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Jul 9, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Jul 1, 2020

Page view(s)

85
checked on Jun 26, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.