Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Depictive structure?||Authors:||Blumson, B.||Issue Date:||Mar-2011||Citation:||Blumson, B. (2011-03). Depictive structure?. Philosophical Papers 40 (1) : 1-25. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2011.560026||Abstract:||This paper argues against definitions of depiction in terms of the syntactic and semantic properties of symbol systems. In particular, it is argued that John Kulvicki's definition of depictive symbol systems in terms of relative repleteness, semantic richness, syntactic sensitivity and transparency is susceptible to similar counterexamples as Nelson Goodman's in terms of syntactic density, semantic density and relative repleteness. The general moral drawn is that defining depiction requires attention not merely to descriptive questions about syntax and semantics, but also to foundational questions about what makes it the case that depictions have the syntactic and semantic properties they do. © 2011 The Editorial Board, Philosophical Papers.||Source Title:||Philosophical Papers||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124465||ISSN:||05568641||DOI:||10.1080/05568641.2011.560026|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.