Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Inconsistent regulators: Evidence from banking
Authors: Agarwal, S. 
Lucca, D.
Seru, A.
Trebbi, F.
Issue Date: 2014
Citation: Agarwal, S., Lucca, D., Seru, A., Trebbi, F. (2014). Inconsistent regulators: Evidence from banking. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (2) : 889-938. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: We find that regulators can implement identical rules inconsistently due to differences in their institutional design and incentives, and this behavior may adversely impact the effectiveness with which regulation is implemented. We study supervisory decisions of U.S. banking regulators and exploit a legally determined rotation policy that assigns federal and state supervisors to the same bank at exogenously set time intervals. Comparing federal and state regulator supervisory ratings within the same bank, we find that federal regulators are systematically tougher, downgrading supervisory ratings almost twice as frequently as do state supervisors. State regulators counteract these downgrades to some degree by upgrading more frequently. Under federal regulators, banks report worse asset quality, higher regulatory capital ratios, and lower return on assets. Leniency of state regulators relative to their federal counterparts is related to costly outcomes, such as higher failure rates and lower repayment rates of government assistance funds. The discrepancy in regulator behavior is related to different weights given by regulators to local economic conditions and, to some extent, differences in regulatory resources. We find no support for regulator self-interest, which includes "revolving doors" as a reason for leniency of state regulators. © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved.
Source Title: Quarterly Journal of Economics
ISSN: 15314650
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qju003
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


checked on Feb 4, 2023


checked on Jan 26, 2023

Page view(s)

checked on Feb 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.