Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/113886
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Effectiveness of composite cure with pulse activation and soft-start polymerization | |
dc.contributor.author | Yap, A.U.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Soh, M.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Siow, K.S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-01T08:22:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-01T08:22:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Yap, A.U.J.,Soh, M.S.,Siow, K.S. (2002-01). Effectiveness of composite cure with pulse activation and soft-start polymerization. Operative Dentistry 27 (1) : 44-49. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 03617734 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/113886 | |
dc.description.abstract | The study investigated the effectiveness of composite cure with pulse activation and soft-start polymerization. A light-cure unit (BISCO VIP, BISCO Dental Products, Schaumburg, IL 60193, USA) that allowed for independent command over time and intensity was used. The six light-curing modes examined were: Control (C)-400 mW/cm 2 [40 seconds]; Pulse Delay I (PDI) -100 mW/cm 2 [3 seconds] → delay [3 minutes] → 500 mW/cm 2 [30 seconds]; Pulse Delay II (PDII) - 200 mW/cm 2 [20 seconds] → delay [3 minutes] → 500 mW/cm 2 [30 seconds]; Soft-start (SS) - 200 mW/cm 2 [10 seconds] → 600 mW/cm 2 [30 seconds]; Pulse Cure I (PCI) - 400 mW/cm 2 [10 seconds] → delay [10 seconds] → 400 mW/cm 2 [10 seconds] → delay [10 seconds] → 400 mW/cm 2 [20 seconds]; and Pulse Cure II (PCII) - 400 mW/cm 2 [20 seconds] → delay [20 seconds] → 400 mW/cm 2 [20 seconds]. Effectiveness of cure with the different modes was determined by measuring the top and bottom surface hardness of 2 mm thick composite (Z100) specimens using a digital microhardness tester (load=500 gf; dwell time=15 seconds). The effectiveness of cure of the bottom surface of the composite was also established by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy using the KBr technique. Data obtained was analyzed using one-way ANOVA/Scheffe's post-hoc test (p | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | CHEMISTRY | |
dc.contributor.department | RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Operative Dentistry | |
dc.description.volume | 27 | |
dc.description.issue | 1 | |
dc.description.page | 44-49 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | NOT_IN_WOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.