Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000185434.08051.82
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUtility values in Singapore Chinese adults with primary open-angle and primary angle-closure glaucoma
dc.contributor.authorSaw, S.-M.
dc.contributor.authorGazzard, G.
dc.contributor.authorEong, K.-G.A.
dc.contributor.authorOen, F.
dc.contributor.authorSeah, S.
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-01T06:57:32Z
dc.date.available2014-12-01T06:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2005-12
dc.identifier.citationSaw, S.-M., Gazzard, G., Eong, K.-G.A., Oen, F., Seah, S. (2005-12). Utility values in Singapore Chinese adults with primary open-angle and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma 14 (6) : 455-462. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000185434.08051.82
dc.identifier.issn10570829
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/113707
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate utility values in Chinese glaucoma patients. Patient and Methods: Singapore Chinese residents (n = 213) with primary open-angle glaucoma or primary angle-closure glaucoma were recruited from a single tertiary ophthalmic center. Standard face-to-face interviews were conducted to ask about utility values (time trade-off and standard gamble for both death and blindness). Ocular information, including current visual acuity, intraocular pressure, visual field defect, and cup-disc ratio were also obtained. Results: The mean time trade-off utility value was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.85, 0.91), and standard gamble for death and blindness were 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.93, 0.96) and 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.93, 0.97), respectively. Only 35.7% of patients were willing to trade time, and 34.3% willing to risk blindness in return for perfect vision. Both primary angle-closure glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma patients had similar utility values. After adjusting for age, gender, language spoken, educational level, and diagnosis, patients with better eye visual field PSD > 10 were 2.52 times (95% confidence interval 1.13, 5.61) more willing to trade time. In a multivariate model, the odds ratio of willingness to risk blindness for a complete hypothetical glaucoma cure was 9.88 (95% confidence interval 1.65, 59.23) for patients who had only visited an ophthalmologist 15 years or more ago, and 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.27, 1.02) for patients who had previous trabeculectomy. Conclusion: Most Chinese glaucoma patients in Singapore are not willing to trade time or risk blindness. Patients with worse visual fields in the better-seeing eye are more willing to trade time; whereas patients who have not seen an ophthalmologist for at least 15 years or who had no history of a previous trabeculectomy are more willing to risk blindness. Copyright © 2005 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000185434.08051.82
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGlaucoma
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectUtilities
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNITY,OCCUPATIONAL & FAMILY MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1097/01.ijg.0000185434.08051.82
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Glaucoma
dc.description.volume14
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page455-462
dc.description.codenJOGLE
dc.identifier.isiut000233413200008
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.