Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/113659
DC FieldValue
dc.titleStatistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.
dc.contributor.authorKoh, D.
dc.contributor.authorOng, C.N.
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-01T06:56:59Z
dc.date.available2014-12-01T06:56:59Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.citationLee, J.,Koh, D.,Ong, C.N. (1989). Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Computers in Biology and Medicine 19 (1) : 61-70. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00104825
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/113659
dc.description.abstractHerein we suggest that two methods for measuring a quantitative variable can be judged interchangeable provided all of the following conditions are met: first, the methods must not exhibit marked additive or nonadditive systematic bias; second, the difference between the two mean readings is not 'statistically significant'; third, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the intraclass correlation is at least 0.75. Statistical procedures to evaluate these conditions of interchangeability are described in detail. A computer program coded in SAS to carry out the procedures is listed in the Appendix. A similar program coded in DBASE III PLUS for the microcomputer is available upon request.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNITY,OCCUPATIONAL & FAMILY MEDICINE
dc.description.sourcetitleComputers in Biology and Medicine
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page61-70
dc.description.codenCBMDA
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

113
checked on Feb 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.