Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | In vivo biocompatibility of two PEG/PAA interpenetrating polymer networks as corneal inlays following deep stromal pocket implantation | |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, X.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hartman, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, K.P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Poh, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Myung, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, L.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Waters, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Noolandi, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Beuerman, R.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Frank, C.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ta, C.N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, D.T.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mehta, J.S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-11-26T08:28:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-11-26T08:28:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tan, X.W., Hartman, L., Tan, K.P., Poh, R., Myung, D., Zheng, L.L., Waters, D., Noolandi, J., Beuerman, R.W., Frank, C.W., Ta, C.N., Tan, D.T.H., Mehta, J.S. (2013-04). In vivo biocompatibility of two PEG/PAA interpenetrating polymer networks as corneal inlays following deep stromal pocket implantation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 24 (4) : 967-977. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 09574530 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110129 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study compared the effects of implanting two interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) into rabbit corneas. The first (Implant 1) was based on PEG-diacrylate, the second (Implant 2) was based on PEG-diacrylamide. There were inserted into deep stromal pockets created using a manual surgical technique for either 3 or 6 months. The implanted corneas were compared with normal and sham-operated corneas through slit lamp observation, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, in vivo confocal scanning and histological examination. Corneas with Implant 1 (based on PEG-diacrylate) developed diffuse haze, ulcers and opacities within 3 months, while corneas with Implant 2 (based on PEG-diacrylamide) remained clear at 6 months. They also exhibited normal numbers of epithelial cell layers, without any immune cell infiltration, inflammation, oedema or neovascularisation at post-operative 6 month. Morphological studies showed transient epithelial layer thinning over the hydrogel inserted area and elevated keratocyte activity at 3 months; however, the epithelium thickness and keratocyte morphology were improved at 6 months. Implant 2 exhibited superior in vivo biocompatibility and higher optical clarity than Implant 1. PEG-diacrylamide-based IPN hydrogel is therefore a potential candidate for corneal inlays to correct refractive error. © 2013 The Author(s). | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | DUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine | |
dc.description.volume | 24 | |
dc.description.issue | 4 | |
dc.description.page | 967-977 | |
dc.description.coden | JSMME | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000318509100013 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.