Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3
DC FieldValue
dc.titleIn vivo biocompatibility of two PEG/PAA interpenetrating polymer networks as corneal inlays following deep stromal pocket implantation
dc.contributor.authorTan, X.W.
dc.contributor.authorHartman, L.
dc.contributor.authorTan, K.P.
dc.contributor.authorPoh, R.
dc.contributor.authorMyung, D.
dc.contributor.authorZheng, L.L.
dc.contributor.authorWaters, D.
dc.contributor.authorNoolandi, J.
dc.contributor.authorBeuerman, R.W.
dc.contributor.authorFrank, C.W.
dc.contributor.authorTa, C.N.
dc.contributor.authorTan, D.T.H.
dc.contributor.authorMehta, J.S.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T08:28:53Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T08:28:53Z
dc.date.issued2013-04
dc.identifier.citationTan, X.W., Hartman, L., Tan, K.P., Poh, R., Myung, D., Zheng, L.L., Waters, D., Noolandi, J., Beuerman, R.W., Frank, C.W., Ta, C.N., Tan, D.T.H., Mehta, J.S. (2013-04). In vivo biocompatibility of two PEG/PAA interpenetrating polymer networks as corneal inlays following deep stromal pocket implantation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 24 (4) : 967-977. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3
dc.identifier.issn09574530
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110129
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the effects of implanting two interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) into rabbit corneas. The first (Implant 1) was based on PEG-diacrylate, the second (Implant 2) was based on PEG-diacrylamide. There were inserted into deep stromal pockets created using a manual surgical technique for either 3 or 6 months. The implanted corneas were compared with normal and sham-operated corneas through slit lamp observation, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, in vivo confocal scanning and histological examination. Corneas with Implant 1 (based on PEG-diacrylate) developed diffuse haze, ulcers and opacities within 3 months, while corneas with Implant 2 (based on PEG-diacrylamide) remained clear at 6 months. They also exhibited normal numbers of epithelial cell layers, without any immune cell infiltration, inflammation, oedema or neovascularisation at post-operative 6 month. Morphological studies showed transient epithelial layer thinning over the hydrogel inserted area and elevated keratocyte activity at 3 months; however, the epithelium thickness and keratocyte morphology were improved at 6 months. Implant 2 exhibited superior in vivo biocompatibility and higher optical clarity than Implant 1. PEG-diacrylamide-based IPN hydrogel is therefore a potential candidate for corneal inlays to correct refractive error. © 2013 The Author(s).
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE
dc.description.doi10.1007/s10856-012-4848-3
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page967-977
dc.description.codenJSMME
dc.identifier.isiut000318509100013
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.