Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.043
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDoes PACS improve diagnostic accuracy in chest radiograph interpretations in clinical practice?
dc.contributor.authorHurlen, P.
dc.contributor.authorBorthne, A.
dc.contributor.authorDahl, F.A.
dc.contributor.authorØstbye, T.
dc.contributor.authorGulbrandsen, P.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T08:27:47Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T08:27:47Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.identifier.citationHurlen, P., Borthne, A., Dahl, F.A., Østbye, T., Gulbrandsen, P. (2012-01). Does PACS improve diagnostic accuracy in chest radiograph interpretations in clinical practice?. European Journal of Radiology 81 (1) : 173-177. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.043
dc.identifier.issn0720048X
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110034
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the impact of a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) on the diagnostic accuracy of the interpretation of chest radiology examinations in a "real life" radiology setting. Materials and methods: During a period before PACS was introduced to radiologists, when images were still interpreted on film and reported on paper, images and reports were also digitally stored in an image database. The same database was used after the PACS introduction. This provided a unique opportunity to conduct a blinded retrospective study, comparing sensitivity (the main outcome parameter) in the pre and post-PACS periods. We selected 56 digitally stored chest radiograph examinations that were originally read and reported on film, and 66 examinations that were read and reported on screen 2 years after the PACS introduction. Each examination was assigned a random number, and both reports and images were scored independently for pathological findings. The blinded retrospective score for the original reports were then compared with the score for the images (the gold standard). Results: Sensitivity was improved after the PACS introduction. When both certain and uncertain findings were included, this improvement was statistically significant. There were no other statistically significant changes. Conclusion: The result is consistent with prospective studies concluding that diagnostic accuracy is at least not reduced after PACS introduction. The sensitivity may even be improved. © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.043
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChest radiograph
dc.subjectCost benefit
dc.subjectDiagnostic accuracy
dc.subjectICT
dc.subjectPACS
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.043
dc.description.sourcetitleEuropean Journal of Radiology
dc.description.volume81
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page173-177
dc.description.codenEJRAD
dc.identifier.isiut000299109800042
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.