Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109819
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA practical guide for multivariate analysis of dichotomous outcomes
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.
dc.contributor.authorChuen, S.T.
dc.contributor.authorKee, S.C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T07:50:18Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T07:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2009-08
dc.identifier.citationLee, J.,Chuen, S.T.,Kee, S.C. (2009-08). A practical guide for multivariate analysis of dichotomous outcomes. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 38 (8) : 714-719. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn03044602
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109819
dc.description.abstractA dichotomous (2-category) outcome variable is often encountered in biomedical research, and Multiple Logistic Regression is often deployed for the analysis of such data. As Logistic Regression estimates the Odds Ratio (OR) as an effect measure, it is only suitable for case-control studies. For cross-sectional and time-to-event studies, the Prevalence Ratio and Cumulative Incidence Ratio can be estimated and easily interpreted. The logistic regression will produce the OR which is difficult to interpret in these studies. In this report, we reviewed 3 alternative multivariate statistical models to replace Logistic Regression for the analysis of data from cross-sectional and time-to-event studies, viz, Modified Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Model, Log-Binomial Regression Model and Poisson Regression Model incorporating the Robust Sandwich Variance. Although none of the models is without flaws, we conclude the last model is the most viable. A numeric example is given to compare the statistical results obtained from all 4 models.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAlternatives to logistic regression
dc.subjectCross-sectional studies
dc.subjectRisk ratio vs odds ratio
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentEPIDEMIOLOGY & PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.sourcetitleAnnals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
dc.description.volume38
dc.description.issue8
dc.description.page714-719
dc.description.codenAAMSC
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.