Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-164
Title: Seroconversion and asymptomatic infections during oseltamivir prophylaxis against Influenza A H1N1 2009
Authors: Lee, V.J. 
Yap, J.
Tay, J.K.
Barr, I.
Gao, Q.
Ho, H.J.
Tan, B.H.
Kelly, P.M.
Tambyah, P.A.
Kelso, A.
Chen, M.I.
Issue Date: 10-Jun-2010
Citation: Lee, V.J., Yap, J., Tay, J.K., Barr, I., Gao, Q., Ho, H.J., Tan, B.H., Kelly, P.M., Tambyah, P.A., Kelso, A., Chen, M.I. (2010-06-10). Seroconversion and asymptomatic infections during oseltamivir prophylaxis against Influenza A H1N1 2009. BMC Infectious Diseases 10 : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-164
Abstract: Background: Anti-viral prophylaxis is used to prevent the transmission of influenza. We studied serological confirmation of 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) infections during oseltamivir prophylaxis and after cessation of prophylaxis.Methods: Between 22 Jun and 16 Jul 09, we performed a cohort study in 3 outbreaks in the Singapore military where post-exposure oseltamivir ring chemoprophylaxis (75 mg daily for 10 days) was administered. The entire cohort was screened by RT-PCR (with HA gene primers) using nasopharyngeal swabs three times a week. Three blood samples were taken for haemagglutination inhibition testing - at the start of outbreak, 2 weeks after completion of 10 day oseltamivir prophylaxis, and 3 weeks after the pandemic's peak in Singapore. Questionnaires were also administered to collect clinical symptoms.Results: 237 personnel were included for analysis. The overall infection rate of 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) during the three outbreaks was 11.4% (27/237). This included 11 index cases and 16 personnel (7.1%) who developed four-fold or higher rise in antibody titres during oseltamivir prophylaxis. Of these 16 personnel, 8 (3.5%) were symptomatic while the remaining 8 personnel (3.5%) were asymptomatic and tested negative on PCR. Post-cessation of prophylaxis, an additional 23 (12.1%) seroconverted. There was no significant difference in mean fold-rise in GMT between those who seroconverted during and post-prophylaxis (11.3 vs 11.7, p = 0.888). No allergic, neuropsychiatric or other severe side-effects were noted.Conclusions: Post-exposure oseltamivir prophylaxis reduced the rate of infection during outbreaks, and did not substantially increase subsequent infection rates upon cessation. Asymptomatic infections occur during prophylaxis, which may confer protection against future infection. Post-exposure prophylaxis is effective as a measure in mitigating pandemic influenza outbreaks. © 2010 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: BMC Infectious Diseases
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109647
ISSN: 14712334
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-164
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2010-Seroconversion_asymptomatic_infections_during_oseltamivir-published.pdf457.13 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Oct 11, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
checked on Oct 11, 2019

Page view(s)

79
checked on Oct 11, 2019

Download(s)

8
checked on Oct 11, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.