Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.009
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePrevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membranes in a multi-ethnic United States population
dc.contributor.authorNg, C.H.
dc.contributor.authorCheung, N.
dc.contributor.authorWang, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorIslam, A.F.M.
dc.contributor.authorKawasaki, R.
dc.contributor.authorMeuer, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorCotch, M.F.
dc.contributor.authorKlein, B.E.K.
dc.contributor.authorKlein, R.
dc.contributor.authorWong, T.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T07:47:08Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T07:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2011-04
dc.identifier.citationNg, C.H., Cheung, N., Wang, J.J., Islam, A.F.M., Kawasaki, R., Meuer, S.M., Cotch, M.F., Klein, B.E.K., Klein, R., Wong, T.Y. (2011-04). Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membranes in a multi-ethnic United States population. Ophthalmology 118 (4) : 694-699. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.009
dc.identifier.issn01616420
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109540
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To describe the prevalence of and risk factors for epiretinal membrane (ERM) in a multi-ethnic population and to evaluate possible racial or ethnic differences. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), examined at the second visit of the MESA when retinal photography was performed. Methods: Data on 5960 participants aged 45 to 84 years from MESA, including white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese persons from 6 United States communities, were analyzed. Epiretinal membrane was assessed from digital nonstereoscopic fundus photographs and was defined as cellophane macular reflex (CMR) without retinal folds or preretinal macular fibrosis (PMF) with retinal folds. Risk factors were assessed from standardized interviews, clinical examinations, and laboratory investigations. Main Outcome Measures: Epiretinal membrane prevalence by ethnic or racial group and risk factors associated with ERM. Results: The prevalence of any ERM was 28.9%, of which 25.1% were CMR cases and 3.8% were PMF cases. The prevalence of ERM was significantly higher in Chinese persons (39.0%), compared with Hispanic (29.3%), white (27.5%), or black (26.2%; P
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.009
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentOPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.009
dc.description.sourcetitleOphthalmology
dc.description.volume118
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page694-699
dc.description.codenOPHTD
dc.identifier.isiut000289075200013
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.