Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2013.848457
Title: | Birth order and myopia | Authors: | Guggenheim, J.A. McMahon, G. Northstone, K. Mandel, Y. Kaiserman, I. Stone, R.A. Lin, X. Saw, S.M. Forward, H. Mackey, D.A. Yazar, S. Young, T.L. Williams, C. |
Keywords: | Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Birth order Myopia Raine Eye Health Study Refractive error Singapore Cohort Study of Risk Factors for Myopia |
Issue Date: | Dec-2013 | Citation: | Guggenheim, J.A., McMahon, G., Northstone, K., Mandel, Y., Kaiserman, I., Stone, R.A., Lin, X., Saw, S.M., Forward, H., Mackey, D.A., Yazar, S., Young, T.L., Williams, C. (2013-12). Birth order and myopia. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 20 (6) : 375-384. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2013.848457 | Abstract: | Purpose: An association between birth order and reduced unaided vision (a surrogate for myopia) has been observed previously. We examined the association between birth order and myopia directly in four subject groups. Methods: Subject groups were participants in (1) the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; UK; age 15 years; N=4401), (2) the Singapore Cohort Study of Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM; Singapore; age 13 years; N=1959), (3) the Raine Eye Health Study (REHS; Australia; age 20 years; N=1344), and (4) Israeli Defense Force Pre-recruitment Candidates (IDFC; Israel; age 16-22 years; N=888,277). The main outcome was odds ratios (OR) for myopia in first-born versus non-first-born individuals after adjusting for potential risk factors. Results: The prevalence of myopia was numerically higher in first-born versus non-first-born individuals in all study groups, but the strength of evidence varied widely. Adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals, CIs) were: ALSPAC, 1.31 (1.05-1.64); SCORM, 1.25 (0.89-1.77); REHS, 1.18 (0.90-1.55); and IDFC, 1.04 (1.03-1.06). In the large IDFC sample, the effect size was greater (a) for the first-born versus fourth- or higher-born comparison than for the first-born versus second/third-born comparison (p | Source Title: | Ophthalmic Epidemiology | URI: | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108880 | ISSN: | 09286586 | DOI: | 10.3109/09286586.2013.848457 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.