Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.079343
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUncorrected refractive error in Singapore teenagers
dc.contributor.authorHo, C.-S.D.
dc.contributor.authorNg, C.-B.C.
dc.contributor.authorChan, E.
dc.contributor.authorNgeow, A.
dc.contributor.authorWijaya, R.
dc.contributor.authorAshok, V.
dc.contributor.authorTang, W.
dc.contributor.authorGazzard, G.
dc.contributor.authorChua, W.-H.
dc.contributor.authorSaw, S.-M.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T09:47:58Z
dc.date.available2014-11-25T09:47:58Z
dc.date.issued2006-02
dc.identifier.citationHo, C.-S.D., Ng, C.-B.C., Chan, E., Ngeow, A., Wijaya, R., Ashok, V., Tang, W., Gazzard, G., Chua, W.-H., Saw, S.-M. (2006-02). Uncorrected refractive error in Singapore teenagers. British Journal of Ophthalmology 90 (2) : 202-207. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.079343
dc.identifier.issn00071161
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108588
dc.description.abstractAim: To study the prevalence rate of unconnected refractive error and associated risk factors among Singapore schoolchildren aged 12-16 years (grade 7). Methods: A cross sectional study of 628 participants (participation rate 99.8%) was conducted in two schools. An interviewer led questionnaire asking about sociodemographic variables and risk factors was administered. Refractive errors were measured using a table mounted autorefractor. Participants with habitual visual acuity (VA) of 0.2 logMAR or worse underwent subjective refraction. Uncorrected refractive error was defined as improvement of at least 0.2 logMAR in best corrected visual acuity after subjective refraction. Results: The prevalence rate of uncorrected refractive error was 22.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 19.0% to 25.5%). The multivariate adjusted odds ratio of uncorrected refractive error in students with the lowest academic ability was 2.24 (95% CI 1.34 to 3.73). Increasing time interval since the last visit to an eye care provider increased the risk of uncorrected refractive error (trend p = 0.001). Conclusion: Uncorrected refractive error was a significant problem among Singapore students aged 12-16 years (grade 7). Uncorrected refractive error was more common among students with low academic ability or those who had not visited an eye care provider for a long time.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.079343
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentINSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR & CELL BIOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNITY,OCCUPATIONAL & FAMILY MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1136/bjo.2005.079343
dc.description.sourcetitleBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
dc.description.volume90
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page202-207
dc.description.codenBJOPA
dc.identifier.isiut000234721300020
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.