Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.18.1944
DC FieldValue
dc.titleShort- and long-term mortality with localized prostate cancer
dc.contributor.authorMerglen, A.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidlin, F.
dc.contributor.authorFioretta, G.
dc.contributor.authorVerkooijen, H.M.
dc.contributor.authorRapiti, E.
dc.contributor.authorZanetti, R.
dc.contributor.authorMiralbell, R.
dc.contributor.authorBouchardy, C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T09:47:24Z
dc.date.available2014-11-25T09:47:24Z
dc.date.issued2007-10-08
dc.identifier.citationMerglen, A., Schmidlin, F., Fioretta, G., Verkooijen, H.M., Rapiti, E., Zanetti, R., Miralbell, R., Bouchardy, C. (2007-10-08). Short- and long-term mortality with localized prostate cancer. Archives of Internal Medicine 167 (18) : 1944-1950. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.18.1944
dc.identifier.issn00039926
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108543
dc.description.abstractBackground: No clear guidelines exist for managing localized prostate cancer because clinical studies have not yet established which treatment provides the best long-term outcome. We assessed the effect of treatment on prostate cancer-specific mortality considering the determinants of treatment and prognosis. Methods: The population-based cohort included all 844 patients having a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1998, in Geneva, Switzerland. Treatments included prostatectomy (n=158), radiotherapy (n=205), watchful waiting (n=378), hormone therapy (n=72), and other types of therapy (n=31). We compared survival curves using the log-rank test. With multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis and propensity score methods, we evaluated the independent effect of treatments on prostate cancer-specific mortality. Results: Treatment options only slightly influenced 5-year prostate cancer-specific mortality but had an important effect on long-term mortality. Ten-year specific survival was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-93%), 75% (95% CI, 67%-83%), and 72% (95% CI, 66%-80%) for patients who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, and watchful waiting, respectively (P
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.18.1944
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNITY,OCCUPATIONAL & FAMILY MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1001/archinte.167.18.1944
dc.description.sourcetitleArchives of Internal Medicine
dc.description.volume167
dc.description.issue18
dc.description.page1944-1950
dc.description.codenAIMDA
dc.identifier.isiut000249948400004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.