Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.029
DC FieldValue
dc.titleIntravitreal triamcinolone prior to laser treatment of diabetic macular edema: 24-month results of a randomized controlled trial
dc.contributor.authorGillies, M.C.
dc.contributor.authorMcAllister, I.L.
dc.contributor.authorZhu, M.
dc.contributor.authorWong, W.
dc.contributor.authorLouis, D.
dc.contributor.authorArnold, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorWong, T.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T09:46:13Z
dc.date.available2014-11-25T09:46:13Z
dc.date.issued2011-05
dc.identifier.citationGillies, M.C., McAllister, I.L., Zhu, M., Wong, W., Louis, D., Arnold, J.J., Wong, T.Y. (2011-05). Intravitreal triamcinolone prior to laser treatment of diabetic macular edema: 24-month results of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 118 (5) : 866-872. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.029
dc.identifier.issn01616420
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108440
dc.description.abstractPurpose To report the 24 months outcomes from a clinical trial of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) plus laser versus laser treatment only in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Prospective, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Participants Eighty-four eyes of 54 participants were entered into the study, with 42 eyes randomly assigned to receive IVTA plus laser and 42 randomly assigned to receive laser treatment alone. Primary end point data were available for 71 (84.5%) eyes at 24 months, with last visual acuity observation carried forward for the remaining eyes. Methods Best-corrected logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) by optical coherence tomography were measured after laser treatment preceded by either IVTA or sham. Main Outcomes Measures The primary outcome was the proportion of eyes with improvement in visual acuity of 10 letters or more at 24 months. The secondary outcomes were mean visual acuity, requirement for further treatment, change in CMT, and adverse events. Results At 24 months, improvement of 10 logMAR letters or more was seen in 15 (36%) of 42 eyes treated with IVTA plus laser compared with 7 (17%) of 42 eyes treated with laser only (P = 0.047; odds ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.017.67). There was no difference in the mean CMT or mean logMAR visual acuity between 2 groups. At least 1 retreatment was required in the second year of the study in 29 (69%) of 42 IVTA plus laser-treated eyes compared with 19 (45%) of 42 laser only eyes (P = 0.187). Cataracts were removed from 17 (61%) of 28 phakic IVTA plus laser-treated eyes versus 0 (0%) of 27 laser only eyes (P
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.029
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentOPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.029
dc.description.sourcetitleOphthalmology
dc.description.volume118
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page866-872
dc.description.codenOPHTD
dc.identifier.isiut000290090300012
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

34
checked on Oct 22, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on Oct 22, 2019

Page view(s)

40
checked on Oct 11, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.