Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065559
DC FieldValue
dc.titleComparison of Anterior Segment Optical Tomography Parameters Measured Using a Semi-Automatic Software to Standard Clinical Instruments
dc.contributor.authorAng, M.
dc.contributor.authorChong, W.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, H.
dc.contributor.authorTay, W.T.
dc.contributor.authorWong, T.Y.
dc.contributor.authorHe, M.-G.
dc.contributor.authorAung, T.
dc.contributor.authorMehta, J.S.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T09:44:28Z
dc.date.available2014-11-25T09:44:28Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-04
dc.identifier.citationAng, M., Chong, W., Huang, H., Tay, W.T., Wong, T.Y., He, M.-G., Aung, T., Mehta, J.S. (2013-06-04). Comparison of Anterior Segment Optical Tomography Parameters Measured Using a Semi-Automatic Software to Standard Clinical Instruments. PLoS ONE 8 (6) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065559
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108307
dc.description.abstractObjective:To compare anterior segment parameters measured using a semi-automatic software (Zhongshan Angle Assessment Program, ZAP) applied to anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images, with commonly used instruments.Methods:Cross-sectional study of a total of 1069 subjects (1069 eyes) from three population-based studies of adults aged 40-80 years. All subjects underwent AS-OCT imaging and ZAP software was applied to determine anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior and keratometry (K) - readings. These were compared to auto-refraction, keratometry and ocular biometry measured using an IOLMaster, ultrasound pachymeter and auto-refractor respectively. Agreements between AS-OCT (ZAP) and clinical instrument modalities were described using Bland-Altman, 95% limits of agreement (LOA).Results:The mean age of our subjects was 56.9±9.5 years and 50.9% were male. The mean AS-OCT (ZAP) parameters of our study cohort were: ACD 3.29±0.35 mm, CCT 560.75±35.07 μm; K-reading 46.79±2.72 D. There was good agreement between the measurements from ZAP analysis and each instrument and no violations in the assumptions of the LOA; albeit with a systematic bias for each comparison: AS-OCT consistently measured a deeper ACD compared to IOLMaster (95% LOA -0.24, 0.55); and a thicker CCT for the AS-OCT compared to ultrasound pachymetry (16.8±0.53 μm 95% LOA -17.3, 50.8). AS-OCT had good agreement with auto-refractor with at least 95% of the measurements within the prediction interval (P value
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065559
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE
dc.contributor.departmentOPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0065559
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page-
dc.identifier.isiut000319961900067
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2013-comparison_anterior_segment_optical_tomography-published.pdf920.49 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.