Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474940802445964
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDiscussion on "Is average run length to false alarm always an informative criterion?" by Yajun Mei
dc.contributor.authorLai, T.L.
dc.contributor.authorChan, H.P.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T05:16:49Z
dc.date.available2014-10-28T05:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2008-10
dc.identifier.citationLai, T.L., Chan, H.P. (2008-10). Discussion on "Is average run length to false alarm always an informative criterion?" by Yajun Mei. Sequential Analysis 27 (4) : 385-388. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474940802445964
dc.identifier.issn07474946
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/105484
dc.description.abstractWe comment on Mei's critique of the standard minimax formulation with the ARL to false alarm of a sequential detection rule as its operating characteristic, and provide an alternative Bayesian approach for his use of a mixing distribution to handle pre-change parameters. We also consider computational issues in implementing the ARL and better alternatives for evaluating sequential detection rules in complex stochastic systems. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07474940802445964
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBayesian change-point
dc.subjectHidden Markov models
dc.subjectImportance sampling and resampling
dc.typeOthers
dc.contributor.departmentSTATISTICS & APPLIED PROBABILITY
dc.description.doi10.1080/07474940802445964
dc.description.sourcetitleSequential Analysis
dc.description.volume27
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page385-388
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.