Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2009.037341
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA Bayesian approach to uncertainty analysis of sexually transmitted infection models
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, L.F.
dc.contributor.authorAlkema, L.
dc.contributor.authorDorrington, R.E.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T05:08:59Z
dc.date.available2014-10-28T05:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2010-06
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, L.F., Alkema, L., Dorrington, R.E. (2010-06). A Bayesian approach to uncertainty analysis of sexually transmitted infection models. Sexually Transmitted Infections 86 (3) : 169-174. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2009.037341
dc.identifier.issn13684973
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/104922
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To propose a Bayesian approach to uncertainty analysis of sexually transmitted infection (STI) models, which can be used to quantify uncertainty in model assessments of policy options, estimate regional STI prevalence from sentinel surveillance data and make inferences about STI transmission and natural history parameters. Methods: Prior distributions are specified to represent uncertainty regarding STI parameters. A likelihood function is defined using a hierarchical approach that takes account of variation between study populations, variation in diagnostic accuracy as well as random binomial variation. The method is illustrated using a model of syphilis, gonorrhoea, chlamydial infection and trichomoniasis in South Africa. Results: Model estimates of STI prevalence are in good agreement with observations. Out-of-sample projections and cross-validations also show that the model is reasonably well calibrated. Model predictions of the impact of interventions are subject to significant uncertainty: the predicted reductions in the prevalence of syphilis by 2020, as a result of doubling the rate of health seeking, increasing the proportion of private practitioners using syndromic management protocols and screening all pregnant women for syphilis, are 43% (95% CI 3% to 77%), 9% (95% CI 1% to 19%) and 6% (95% CI 4% to 7%), respectively. Conclusions: This study extends uncertainty analysis techniques for fitted HIV/AIDS models to models that are fitted to other STI prevalence data. There is significant uncertainty regarding the relative effectiveness of different STI control strategies. The proposed technique is reasonable for estimating uncertainty in past STI prevalence levels and for projections of future STI prevalence.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2009.037341
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSTATISTICS & APPLIED PROBABILITY
dc.description.doi10.1136/sti.2009.037341
dc.description.sourcetitleSexually Transmitted Infections
dc.description.volume86
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page169-174
dc.description.codenSTINF
dc.identifier.isiut000278353800006
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.