Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1137/080742889
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Continuous-time markowitz's model with transaction costs | |
dc.contributor.author | Dai, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Xu, Z.Q. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, X.Y. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-28T02:32:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-28T02:32:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dai, M., Xu, Z.Q., Zhou, X.Y. (2010). Continuous-time markowitz's model with transaction costs. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics 1 (1) : 96-125. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1137/080742889 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1945497X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/103061 | |
dc.description.abstract | A continuous-time Markowitz's mean-variance portfolio selection problem is studied in a market with one stock, one bond, and proportional transaction costs. This is a singular stochastic control problem, inherently with a finite time horizon. Via a series of transformations, the problem is turned into a so-called double obstacle problem, a well-studied problem in physics and PDE literature, featuring two time-varying free boundaries. The two boundaries, which define the buy, sell, and no-trade regions, are proved to be smooth in time. This in turn characterizes the optimal strategy, via a Skorokhod problem, as one that tries to keep a certain adjusted bond-stock position within the no-trade region. Several features of the optimal strategy are revealed that are remarkably different from its no-transaction-cost counterpart. It is shown that there exists a critical length in time, which is dependent on the stock excess return as well as the transaction fees but independent of the investment target and the stock volatility, so that an expected terminal return may not be achievable if the planning horizon is shorter than that critical length (while in the absence of transaction costs any expected return can be reached in an arbitrary period of time). It is further demonstrated that anyone following the optimal strategy should not buy the stock beyond the point when the time to maturity is shorter than the aforementioned critical length. Moreover, the investor would be less likely to buy the stock and more likely to sell the stock when the maturity date is getting closer. These features, while consistent with the widely accepted investment wisdom, suggest that the planning horizon is an integral part of the investment opportunities. © 2010 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/080742889 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Continuous-time | |
dc.subject | Double-obstacle problem | |
dc.subject | Lagrange multiplier | |
dc.subject | Mean-variance | |
dc.subject | Planning horizon | |
dc.subject | Singular stochastic control | |
dc.subject | Skorokhod problem | |
dc.subject | Transaction costs | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | MATHEMATICS | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1137/080742889 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics | |
dc.description.volume | 1 | |
dc.description.issue | 1 | |
dc.description.page | 96-125 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000208691600006 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.