Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-111511-103919
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGlobal introductions of crayfishes: Evaluating the impact of species invasions on ecosystem services
dc.contributor.authorLodge, D.M.
dc.contributor.authorDeines, A.
dc.contributor.authorGherardi, F.
dc.contributor.authorYeo, D.C.J.
dc.contributor.authorArcella, T.
dc.contributor.authorBaldridge, A.K.
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorLindsay Chadderton, W.
dc.contributor.authorFeder, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorGantz, C.A.
dc.contributor.authorHoward, G.W.
dc.contributor.authorJerde, C.L.
dc.contributor.authorPeters, B.W.
dc.contributor.authorPeters, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorSargent, L.W.
dc.contributor.authorTurner, C.R.
dc.contributor.authorWittmann, M.E.
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T08:48:26Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T08:48:26Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifier.citationLodge, D.M., Deines, A., Gherardi, F., Yeo, D.C.J., Arcella, T., Baldridge, A.K., Barnes, M.A., Lindsay Chadderton, W., Feder, J.L., Gantz, C.A., Howard, G.W., Jerde, C.L., Peters, B.W., Peters, J.A., Sargent, L.W., Turner, C.R., Wittmann, M.E., Zeng, Y. (2012-12). Global introductions of crayfishes: Evaluating the impact of species invasions on ecosystem services. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43 : 449-472. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-111511-103919
dc.identifier.issn1543592X
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/102460
dc.description.abstractImpacts of nonindigenous crayfishes on ecosystem services exemplify the mixture of positive and negative effects of intentionally introduced species. Global introductions for aquaculture and ornamental purposes have begun to homogenize naturally disjunct global distributions of crayfish families. Negative impacts include the loss of provisioning (e.g., reductions in edible native species, reproductive interference or hybridization with native crayfishes), regulatory (e.g., lethal disease spread, increased costs to agriculture and water management), supporting (e.g., large changes in ecological communities), and cultural (e.g., loss of festivals celebrating native crayfish) services. Where quantification of impacts exists (e.g., Procambarus clarkii and Pacifastacus leniusculus in Europe), regulations now prohibit introduction and spread of crayfishes, indicating that losses of ecosystem services have outweighed gains. Recent research advances such as predicting invasiveness, predicting spread, improved detection and control, and bioeconomic analysis to increase cost-effectiveness of management could be employed to reduce future losses of ecosystem services. © 2012 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-111511-103919
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbioeconomics
dc.subjectbiogeography
dc.subjectexotic species
dc.subjectmanagement
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.description.doi10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-111511-103919
dc.description.sourcetitleAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
dc.description.volume43
dc.description.page449-472
dc.identifier.isiut000311573500021
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.