Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21347
Title: | Identification of small molecule aggregators from large compound libraries by support vector machines | Authors: | Rao, H. Li, Z. Li, X. Ma, X. Ung, C. Li, H. Liu, X. Chen, Y. |
Keywords: | Active compound Aggregation Aggregator Drug discovery High throughput screening Machine learning method Recursive feature elimination Support vector machine Virtual screening |
Issue Date: | Mar-2010 | Citation: | Rao, H., Li, Z., Li, X., Ma, X., Ung, C., Li, H., Liu, X., Chen, Y. (2010-03). Identification of small molecule aggregators from large compound libraries by support vector machines. Journal of Computational Chemistry 31 (4) : 752-763. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21347 | Abstract: | Small molecule aggregators non-specifically inhibit multiple unrelated proteins, rendering them therapeutically useless. They frequently appear as false hits and thus need to be eliminated in high-throughput screening campaigns. Computational methods have been explored for identifying aggregators, which have not been tested in screening large compound libraries. We used 1319 aggregators and 128,325 non-aggregators to develop a support vector machines (SVM) aggregator identification model, which was tested by four methods. The first is five fold cross-validation, which showed comparable aggregator and significantly improved non-aggregator identification rates against earlier studies. The second is the independent test of .17 aggregators discovered independently from the training aggregators, 71% of which were correctly identified. The third is retrospective screening of 13M PUBCHEM and 168K MDDR. compounds, which predicted 97.9% and 98.7% of the PUBCHEM and MDDR compounds as non-aggregators. The fourth is retrospective screening of 5527 MDDR compounds similar to the known aggregators, 1,14% of which were predicted as aggregators. SVM showed slightly better overall performance against two other machine learning methods based on five fold cross-validation studies of the same settings. Molecular features of aggregation, extracted by a feature selection method, are consistent with published profiles. SVM showed substantial capability in identifying aggregators from large libraries at low false-hit rates. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | Source Title: | Journal of Computational Chemistry | URI: | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/100877 | ISSN: | 01928651 | DOI: | 10.1002/jcc.21347 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
SCOPUSTM
Citations
22
checked on Jan 27, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
19
checked on Jan 27, 2023
Page view(s)
228
checked on Feb 2, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.