Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00562.x
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | How Quickly do Fragments of Coral "Self-Attach" after Transplantation? | |
dc.contributor.author | Guest, J.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dizon, R.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Edwards, A.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Franco, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gomez, E.D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-27T08:30:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-27T08:30:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Guest, J.R., Dizon, R.M., Edwards, A.J., Franco, C., Gomez, E.D. (2011-03). How Quickly do Fragments of Coral "Self-Attach" after Transplantation?. Restoration Ecology 19 (2) : 234-242. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00562.x | |
dc.identifier.issn | 10612971 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/100845 | |
dc.description.abstract | Transplantation of coral fragments is seen as a potential method to rapidly restore coral cover to areas of degraded reef; however, considerable research is still needed to assess the effectiveness of coral transplantation as a viable reef restoration tool. Initially, during restoration efforts, coral transplants are attached artificially. Self-attachment (i.e., growth of coral tissue onto the substrate) provides a more secure and lasting bond, thus knowledge about self-attachment times for corals is of importance to reef restoration. While it is known that coral fragments may generate new tissue and bond to substrata within a few weeks of transplantation, surprisingly little is known about the speed of self-attachment for most species. Two independent experiments were carried out to examine the self-attachment times of 12 scleractinian and one non-scleractinian coral species to a natural calcium carbonate substrate. The first experiment examined times to self-attachment in 11 species of differing morphologies from seven families over approximately 7 months, whereas the second experiment examined three fast-attaching Acropora species over approximately 1 month. In the first experiment, the branching species Acropora muricata had a significantly faster self-attachment time compared to all other species, while Echinopora lamellosa had the slowest self-attachment time. For the second experiment, A. muricata was significantly slower to self-attach than Acropora hyacinthus (tabular) and Acropora digitifera (corymbose-digitate). The results suggest that a combination of factors including growth rates, growth form and life history may determine how quickly fragments of coral species self-attach after fragmentation and transplantation. © 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00562.x | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Coral fragmentation | |
dc.subject | Coral reef | |
dc.subject | Coral transplantation | |
dc.subject | Philippines | |
dc.subject | Reef restoration | |
dc.subject | Self-attachment | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00562.x | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Restoration Ecology | |
dc.description.volume | 19 | |
dc.description.issue | 2 | |
dc.description.page | 234-242 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000287932600011 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.