Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Free-energy-based lattice Boltzmann model for the simulation of multiphase flows with density contrast|
|Source:||Shao, J.Y., Shu, C., Huang, H.B., Chew, Y.T. (2014-03-19). Free-energy-based lattice Boltzmann model for the simulation of multiphase flows with density contrast. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 89 (3) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.033309|
|Abstract:||A free-energy-based phase-field lattice Boltzmann method is proposed in this work to simulate multiphase flows with density contrast. The present method is to improve the Zheng-Shu-Chew (ZSC) model [Zheng, Shu, and Chew, J. Comput. Phys. 218, 353 (2006)JCTPAH0021-999110.1016/j.jcp.2006.02.015] for correct consideration of density contrast in the momentum equation. The original ZSC model uses the particle distribution function in the lattice Boltzmann equation (LBE) for the mean density and momentum, which cannot properly consider the effect of local density variation in the momentum equation. To correctly consider it, the particle distribution function in the LBE must be for the local density and momentum. However, when the LBE of such distribution function is solved, it will encounter a severe numerical instability. To overcome this difficulty, a transformation, which is similar to the one used in the Lee-Lin (LL) model [Lee and Lin, J. Comput. Phys. 206, 16 (2005)JCTPAH0021-999110.1016/ j.jcp.2004.12.001] is introduced in this work to change the particle distribution function for the local density and momentum into that for the mean density and momentum. As a result, the present model still uses the particle distribution function for the mean density and momentum, and in the meantime, considers the effect of local density variation in the LBE as a forcing term. Numerical examples demonstrate that both the present model and the LL model can correctly simulate multiphase flows with density contrast, and the present model has an obvious improvement over the ZSC model in terms of solution accuracy. In terms of computational time, the present model is less efficient than the ZSC model, but is much more efficient than the LL model. © 2014 American Physical Society.|
|Source Title:||Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 26, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Feb 26, 2018
checked on Feb 25, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.