Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Geometry of dimer reconstruction on the C(100), Si(100), and Ge(100) surfaces|
|Authors:||Yang, C. |
Chuan Kang, H.
|Source:||Yang, C.,Chuan Kang, H. (1999-06-08). Geometry of dimer reconstruction on the C(100), Si(100), and Ge(100) surfaces. Journal of Chemical Physics 110 (22) : 11029-11037. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.|
|Abstract:||We performed density-functional calculations using cluster models of the C100), Si(100), and Ge(100) surfaces in order to address two issues. First, we resolve the differences in the results from slab calculations and from cluster calculations. Second, we want to contribute to an understanding of the nature and energetics of dimer buckling on these surfaces. We performed calculations using a number of different geometry constraints and three different cluster sizes. The results show that for, at least for density-functional cluster calculations, the geometry, and the buckling energetics are both significantly dependent upon both the choice of geometry constraints and the size of the cluster. Our calculations show that the ground state has a symmetric dimer geometry for the carbon surface and an asymmetric dimer geometry for the silicon and germanium surfaces. This is in agreement with the latest first-principles slab calculations and also consistent with experimental results. Some previous cluster calculations favor a symmetric dimer on the silicon surface. Our density-functional results suggest that the use of either inadequate cluster sizes or inappropriate geometry constraints or a combination of both could have affected these previous calculations. The change in energy of the cluster as a function of the dimer buckling angle is also investigated for all three surfaces. We observed that dimer-buckling is driven by a lowering of the kinetic energy of the electrons. We also find that the nature of the dimer bond is qualitatively different between the carbon surface on the one hand and the silicon and germanium surfaces on the other. We rationalize this in terms of the small core size of the carbon atom and relate it to the different ground-state dimer symmetry found for the C(100) surface as opposed to Si(100) and Ge(100) surfaces. © 1999 American Institute of Physics.|
|Source Title:||Journal of Chemical Physics|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 16, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.