Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90117-9
Title: A Study of the Connectionist Models for Software Reliability Prediction
Authors: Ho, S.L.
Xie, M. 
Goh, T.N. 
Keywords: Directional change
Neural networks
Prediction error
Recurrent models
Software reliability growth
Issue Date: Oct-2003
Source: Ho, S.L., Xie, M., Goh, T.N. (2003-10). A Study of the Connectionist Models for Software Reliability Prediction. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 46 (7) : 1037-1045. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90117-9
Abstract: When analysing software failure data, many software reliability models are available and in particular, nonhomogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) models are commonly used. However, difficulties posed by the assumptions, their validity, and relevance of these assumptions to the real testing environment have limited their usefulness. The connectionist approach using neural network models are more flexible and with less restrictive assumptions. This model-free technique requires only the failure history as inputs and then develops its own internal model of failure process. Their ability to model nonlinear patterns and learn from the data makes it a valuable alternative methodology for characterising the failure process. In this paper, a modified Elman recurrent neural network in modeling and predicting software failures is investigated. The effects of different feedback weights in the proposed model are also studied. A comparative study between the proposed recurrent architecture, with the more popular feedforward neural network, the Jordan recurrent model, and some traditional parametric software reliability growth models are carried out. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source Title: Computers and Mathematics with Applications
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/72262
ISSN: 08981221
DOI: 10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90117-9
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

58
checked on Dec 14, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

44
checked on Nov 18, 2017

Page view(s)

29
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.