Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.068
Title: Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas
Authors: Khalilpour, R.
Karimi, I.A. 
Keywords: CNG
Decision analysis
GTL
LNG
Natural gas field development
Supply chain
Issue Date: Apr-2012
Source: Khalilpour, R., Karimi, I.A. (2012-04). Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas. Energy 40 (1) : 317-328. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.068
Abstract: Options for exporting natural gas from stranded oil and gas fields to markets include pipelines, LNG (liquefied natural gas), CNG (compressed natural gas), GTL (gas to liquids), GTS (gas to solids), and GTW (gas to wire). Thus, the key question is which option is the most robust in ensuring the security of investment over a project life cycle against market fluctuations, trade embargos, political changes, technical advances, etc. Excluding pipelines, LNG, CNG, and GTL have attracted increasing investor attention during the last two decades. Although studies abound on economic comparisons of these processes, a systematic method to address this important problem in the presence of uncertainty seems missing in the literature. This work presents such a method based on decision analysis cycle and considers oil and gas prices as uncertain. Using NPV (net present value) as the decision criterion, it presents the computation of "expected NPV" of each gas utilization alternative to identify the best option. It includes the entire well-to-market supply chain, from extraction, conversion, and transportation, to re-conversion at the target market. Finally, it identifies the sweet spots for LNG, CNG, and GTL alternatives for different reservoir capacities and market distances. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Source Title: Energy
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/63879
ISSN: 03605442
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.068
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

46
checked on Dec 13, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

40
checked on Nov 16, 2017

Page view(s)

64
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.