Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Evaluation of decision fusion strategies for effective collaboration among heterogeneous fault diagnostic methods|
|Source:||Ghosh, K., Ng, Y.S., Srinivasan, R. (2011-02-09). Evaluation of decision fusion strategies for effective collaboration among heterogeneous fault diagnostic methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering 35 (2) : 342-355. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.05.004|
|Abstract:||Numerous methodologies for fault detection and identification (FDI) in chemical processes have been proposed in literature. However, it is extremely difficult to design a perfect FDI method to efficiently monitor an industrial-scale process. In this work, we seek to overcome this difficulty by using multiple heterogeneous FDI methods and fusing their results so that the strengths of the individual FDI methods are combined and their shortcomings overcome. Several decision fusion strategies can be used for this purpose. In this paper, we study the relative benefits of utility-based and evidence-based decision fusion strategies. Our results from a lab-scale distillation column and the popular Tennessee Eastman challenge problem show that in situations where no single FDI method offers adequate performance, evidence-based fusion strategies such as weighted voting, Bayesian, and Dempster-Shafer based fusion can provide (i) complete fault coverage, (ii) more than 40% increase in overall fault recognition rate, (iii) significant improvement in monitoring performance, and (iv) reduction in fault detection and diagnosis delays. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.|
|Source Title:||Computers and Chemical Engineering|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Dec 6, 2017
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Nov 21, 2017
checked on Dec 10, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.