Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||East Asian modernity - A "Distinct" modernity?|
|Keywords:||Convergence and divergence|
Relevance of differences
Varieties of modernity
Western and East Asian modernity
|Citation:||Schmidt, V.H. (2010-06). East Asian modernity - A "Distinct" modernity?. Berliner Journal fur Soziologie 20 (2) : 123-152. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-010-0124-x|
|Abstract:||The article casts doubt on the claim of Eisenstadt and other culturalists that East Asia constitutes a distinct modernity, one that differs fundamentally from Western modernity. Following a brief reconstruction of key modernization theoretical premises against which this claim is directed, it compares the five largest Western countries with the currently most advanced exemplars of East Asian modernity. The findings show that the two regions are remarkably similar in virtually all respects that matter from a modernization theoretical viewpoint. The article then goes on to assess the relevance of the evidence held against modernization theory by Eisenstadt and his followers. As it turns out, this evidence presents no challenge to modernization theory. © VS-Verlag 2010.|
|Source Title:||Berliner Journal fur Soziologie|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Aug 8, 2018
checked on Jul 27, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.