Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Inauthentic sovereignty: Law and legal institutions in Manchukuo|
|Source:||Dubois, T.D. (2010-08). Inauthentic sovereignty: Law and legal institutions in Manchukuo. Journal of Asian Studies 69 (3) : 749-770. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002191181000152X|
|Abstract:||Although Manchukuo is easily dismissed as a puppet of Japan, at the time of its founding, it was one of many examples of a partially sovereign state. Specific compromises of Manchukuo's sovereignty shaped the formation of its domestic institutions, such as the legal sphere, in tangible ways. Manchukuo handed over to Japan the power to staff and ideologically mold its judiciary, while the tutelary attitude that Japan took toward the state was concretely manifested in aspects of Manchukuo penal and civil law, and a surprisingly contentious path to the abrogation of Japanese extraterritoriality. With the outbreak of war, Manchukuo effectively surrendered its national sovereignty to the needs of the Japanese empire, sacrificing its jurisdictional integrity as well. While not denying the deliberate attempt made by Japan to misrepresent the independence of Manchukuo, this article also seeks to understand more precisely how Manchukuo's architects assumed certain limits to state sovereignty, and how this understanding systematically crippled the new state's legal institutions. Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2010.|
|Source Title:||Journal of Asian Studies|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Dec 13, 2017
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Nov 12, 2017
checked on Dec 9, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.