Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016637622896
Title: A capacity analysis for the IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol
Authors: Tay, Y.C. 
Chua, K.C. 
Keywords: Analytic validation
Capacity analysis
Closed-form approximation
IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol
Saturation throughput
Window size adaptation
Issue Date: Mar-2001
Source: Tay, Y.C., Chua, K.C. (2001-03). A capacity analysis for the IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol. Wireless Networks 7 (2) : 159-171. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016637622896
Abstract: The IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol provides shared access to a wireless channel. This paper uses an analytic model to study the channel capacity - i.e., maximum throughput - when using the basic access (two-way handshaking) method in this protocol. It provides closed-form approximations for the probability of collision p, the maximum throughput S and the limit on the number of stations in a wireless cell. The analysis also shows that: p does not depend on the packet length, the latency in crossing the MAC and physical layers, the acknowledgment timeout, the interframe spaces and the slot size; p and S (and other performance measures) depend on the minimum window size W and the number of stations n only through a gap g = W/(n - 1) - consequently, halving W is like doubling n; the maximum contention window size has minimal effect on p and S; the choice of W that maximizes S is proportional to the square root of the packet length; S is maximum when transmission rate (including collisions) equals the reciprocal of transmission time, and this happens when channel wastage due to collisions balances idle bandwidth caused by backoffs. The results suggest guidelines on when and how W can be adjusted to suit measured traffic, thus making the protocol adaptive.
Source Title: Wireless Networks
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/50838
ISSN: 10220038
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016637622896
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

402
checked on Dec 13, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

239
checked on Nov 16, 2017

Page view(s)

62
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.