Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Relative importance of subcontractor selection criteria: Evidence from Singapore|
|Source:||Hartmann, A., Ling, F.Y.Y., Tan, J.S.H. (2009). Relative importance of subcontractor selection criteria: Evidence from Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 135 (9) : 826-832. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:9(826)|
|Abstract:||Subcontractors carry out a large portion of the work done in construction projects. Thus, selecting the right subcontractor essentially contributes to the project's success. We designed a choice-based conjoint experiment to examine the relative importance of four criteria in the subcontractor selection process of main contractors from Singapore: Price, technical know-how, quality, and cooperation. Although main contractors adopt a multicriteria selection process and perceive all four criteria to be important for their choice decision, the actual choice situation reveals that price is still by far the most important selection criterion, followed by quality, cooperation, and technical know-how. Main contractors are not willing to compromise on price but accept a lower performance of a known subcontractor on the remaining criteria. © 2009 ASCE.|
|Source Title:||Journal of Construction Engineering and Management|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Dec 13, 2017
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Nov 16, 2017
checked on Dec 10, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.