Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Performance criteria of a sound office analysis methodology|
|Source:||Ang, J.S.K. (1993). Performance criteria of a sound office analysis methodology. International Journal of Information Management 13 (1) : 51-67. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.|
|Abstract:||Eleven sample office methodologies representing a good, broad cross-section of the existing office methodologies in terms of domain of analysis, office description formalisms, etc. are reviewed and critiqued. Drawing on the critique, a set of four core performance criteria for evaluating office methodologies is derived. The four criteria are: (1) domain of analysis to cover the whole spectrum of office work: (2) understandability and communicability of office descriptions; (3) the concept of levelling; and (4) sound, theoretical basis for generating solutions/recommendations. While several methodologies scored well in the critique, none appeared to satisfy completely all the four criteria which we used to define a 'good' methodology. © 1993 Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.|
|Source Title:||International Journal of Information Management|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Dec 8, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.