Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.479
Title: The contingent effect of social networks on organizational commitment: A comparison of instrumental and expressive ties in a multinational high-technology company
Authors: Kim, Y.-C. 
Rhee, M.
Keywords: Expressive networks
Instrumental networks
Network composition
Organizational commitment
Issue Date: 2010
Source: Kim, Y.-C., Rhee, M. (2010). The contingent effect of social networks on organizational commitment: A comparison of instrumental and expressive ties in a multinational high-technology company. Sociological Perspectives 53 (4) : 479-502. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.479
Abstract: This article examines the relationship between social networks and organizational commitment in a globalized workplace. The authors fnd not only that organizational commitment is affected by the network properties of size, power connection, and national/ethnic composition but also that these network effects are contingent upon whether the content conveyed in the relationship is instrumental or expressive. Results demonstrate that organizational commitment is (1) positively associated with network size in instrumental ties but not in expressive ties, (2) positively associated with the power of network partners in instrumental ties but less so in expressive ties, and (3) positively associated with national/ethnic diversity in expressive ties but not in instrumental ties. Findings highlight the relational foundation of organizational commitment and suggest that social networks of employees, contingent upon specifc content, present different opportunities to their level of commitment to the organization. © 2010 by Pacifc Sociological Association.
Source Title: Sociological Perspectives
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/44747
ISSN: 07311214
DOI: 10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.479
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Dec 6, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Nov 21, 2017

Page view(s)

135
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.