Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01793-3_84
Title: An usability study of continuous biometrics authentication
Authors: Kwang, G.
Yap, R.H.C. 
Sim, T. 
Ramnath, R. 
Issue Date: 2009
Source: Kwang, G.,Yap, R.H.C.,Sim, T.,Ramnath, R. (2009). An usability study of continuous biometrics authentication. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5558 LNCS : 828-837. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01793-3_84
Abstract: We present an usability study for a bi-modality Continuous Biometrics Authentication System (CBAS) that runs on the Windows platform. Our CBAS combines fingerprint and facial biometrics to authenticate users. As authentication is continuous, CBAS constantly contributes a computational overhead of up to 42% to the computer system. This usability study seeks to investigate (a) whether this overhead will have an impact on the performance of users to complete tasks; and (b) whether the users deem the responsiveness of the system to be acceptable. The results of our study are encouraging, indicating that the runtime cost of a CBAS system has no measurable statistical impact on the task completion by users. We found that user acceptance of CBAS to be good and they did not perceive the CBAS to degrade system response. This suggests that continuous biometrics for authentication is viable - the CBAS benefits outweighs system impact drawbacks. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
Source Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/43362
ISBN: 3642017924
ISSN: 03029743
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01793-3_84
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Dec 13, 2017

Page view(s)

96
checked on Dec 9, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.