Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||An analysis of the cost of validating semantic composability|
|Source:||Szabo, C., Teo, Y.M. (2012). An analysis of the cost of validating semantic composability. Journal of Simulation 6 (3) : 152-163. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2012.11|
|Abstract:||Validation of semantic composability is a non-trivial problem and a key step in component-based modelling and simulation. Recent work in semantic composability validation promises to reduce verification, validation, and accreditation efforts. However, the underlying cost of current validation approaches can undermine the promised benefits, and the trade-off between validation accuracy and validation cost is not well understood. In this paper we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first quantitative study on the cost of validating semantic composability. Our study covers four representative validation approaches, including two DEVS-based methods, Petty and Weisel formal validation, and deny-validity, and for simplicity, we use computation time as a measure of validation cost. For a queueing model with 1000 components, there is significant trade-off between validation accuracy and cost, with the time-based deny-validity costing seven times that of timeless Petty and Weisel formalism. © 2012 Operational Research Society Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Journal of Simulation|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Mar 6, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 24, 2018
checked on Mar 11, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.