Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/23056
Title: Understanding the choice of software application: integration of two dominating models
Authors: JULIAN LIN
Keywords: competing software, theory of planned behavior, expectation disconfirmation theory, instant messaging
Issue Date: 19-Mar-2007
Source: JULIAN LIN (2007-03-19). Understanding the choice of software application: integration of two dominating models. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: This thesis examines the preferred choice in competing systems. It draws upon two theories -- which have been applied widely to predict intention in many studies -- to examine competing applications. These theories are the theory of planned behavior and the expectation disconfirmation theory. Further, this thesis attempts to reconcile and integrate these two theories to explain user preference of two instant messaging applications. Subsequently, based on these theories, we build an integrative model to explain the intention to use the most preferred instant messaging software from cognitive, affective, social norm, and constraints elements. In addition, we apply the proposed model in a comparative frame of reference model (relative model) in which relative attitude, relative subjective norm, relative perceived usefulness, relative disconfirmation, relative satisfaction, relative intention, and preferred application are examined. The study is set in the context of two instant messaging technologies: MSN and Yahoo Messenger. Based on a survey from 300 instant messaging users, the result shows that the integrated relative model can explain a very high percentage of the variance in preferred choice. The model integration helps in building a bridge to predict preference using the constructs from two research streams.
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/23056
Appears in Collections:Ph.D Theses (Open)

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Julian.pdf2.47 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Page view(s)

285
checked on Dec 11, 2017

Download(s)

195
checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.