Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Diagnostics for conditional heteroscedasticity models: Some simulation results|
|Source:||Tsui, A.K. (2004). Diagnostics for conditional heteroscedasticity models: Some simulation results. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 64 (1) : 113-119. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(03)00125-3|
|Abstract:||In this paper, we study the size and power of various diagnostic statistics for univariate conditional heteroscedasticity models. These test statistics include the residual-based tests recently derived by Tse, Li and Mak, and Wooldridge, respectively. Monte-Carlo experiments with 1000 replications are conducted to generate conditional variances which follow the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH)/GARCH processes. We use quasi-maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method to obtain estimates of parameters under different ARCH/ generalized ARCH (GARCH) models. It is found that the Tse and Li-Mak diagnostics are more powerful.©2003 IMACS. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Mathematics and Computers in Simulation|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 27, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Feb 19, 2018
checked on Mar 12, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.