Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193411430034
Title: Comparison of the holding capacity of round monofilament, round multifilament, and flat multifilament nitinol suture loops in human cadaveric flexor tendon
Authors: Karjalainen, T.
He, M.
Chong, A.K.S.
Lim, A.Y.T. 
Göransson, H.
Ryhänen, J.
Keywords: Flexor tendon repair
monofilament
multifilament
nitinol
suture
Issue Date: Jun-2012
Citation: Karjalainen, T., He, M., Chong, A.K.S., Lim, A.Y.T., Göransson, H., Ryhänen, J. (2012-06). Comparison of the holding capacity of round monofilament, round multifilament, and flat multifilament nitinol suture loops in human cadaveric flexor tendon. Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume 37 (5) : 459-463. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193411430034
Abstract: Tendon repairs done with strong suture materials fail by suture pull out. To avoid pull out, suture loop needs to have a strong grip on the tendon. The aim of this study was to determine whether a single suture loop has a better grip of the tendon when multifilament or flat sutures are used compared with a conventional monofilament round suture. A cross-locking or simple grasping suture loop was placed into the distal end of a human cadaveric tendon using nitinol wire sutures in the following configurations: round monofilament (200 μm), round multifilament (4 × 100 μm), and flat multifilament (4 × 30 μm × 445 μm). The mean pull-out strength of the round multifilament (49.4 N) and flat multifilament sutures (50.7 N) were significantly higher than that of the round monofilament nitinol suture (36.5 N) when a locking loop was used. Suture grip can be improved by using a multifilament suture and a locking type of suture configuration. © The Author(s) 2012.
Source Title: Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/127079
ISSN: 17531934
DOI: 10.1177/1753193411430034
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.