Ankle arthrodesis vs TTC arthrodesis: Patient outcomes, satisfaction, and return to activity

Abstract

Background: It is believed that patients with an ankle arthrodesis (AA) have better outcomes than after a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis due to preservation of subtalar motion. However, there are no studies comparing actual functional outcomes and patient satisfaction between AA and TTC arthrodesis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patient satisfaction and functional outcomes of patients after an AA and TTC arthrodesis using a postal survey. A total of 173 patients who underwent TTC and 100 AA patients from 2002 to 2010 were identified with a minimum of 24 months follow-up. In all, 53 AA and 64 TTC arthrodesis patients were included in the study, with the remainder lost to follow-up. A return to activity questionnaire and SF-12 scores were used to compare functional outcomes. The mean follow-up time was 63 months. Results: Both groups showed good outcomes with a low visual analogue pain score (2.7 for AA and 2.8 for TTC), high satisfaction score (90.6% for AA and 87.5% for TTC), and return to work (77.4% for AA and 73.0% for TTC). In all, 84.6% of AA and 81.0% of TTC patients would have the surgery again. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for these parameters. However, when asked if their desired activity level was met, fewer AA patients met their desired level (58.5% for AA and 66.5% for TTC, P =.02). AA patients were also more likely to feel their level was unmet due to the foot and ankle (85.6% for AA vs 25.7% for TTC, P