Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Effect of using population-specific body mass index cutoff points in the risk assessment of pregnant Asian women for venous thromboembolism|
|Source:||Randhawa, N.K., Tan, E.K., Sabnis, M.A. (2013-08). Effect of using population-specific body mass index cutoff points in the risk assessment of pregnant Asian women for venous thromboembolism. Singapore Medical Journal 54 (8) : 437-440. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013150|
|Abstract:||Introduction Current international Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines list maternal obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended lower BMI cutoff points for Asians when risk stratifying for diseases associated with obesity, this has not been extended to maternal obesity. In the present study, we compared the difference in using Asian-specific BMI cutoff points as opposed to those in international guidelines in determining the population at risk for VTE, as defined by RCOG guidelines. Methods All spontaneous deliveries (n = 94) and Caesarean sections (n = 41) over a three-week period, and instrumental deliveries (n = 15) over a two-month period, were reviewed and risk stratified based on Asian-specific, as well as international, BMI cut-off points. Results For the group that underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery, the percentage of patients at risk for VTE nearly doubled (from 8.5% to 16.0%) with the revised risk stratification, while that of patients who had instrumental delivery had more than a two-fold increase (250%). In the initial risk stratification of the post-Caesarean patients, none were at high risk of VTE. However, when the lower cut-off points of 27.5 kg/m2 and 23.0 kg/m2 were used, one and three patients were respectively identified to be at high risk. Conclusion Further research and consideration regarding the adjustment of international risk stratification guidelines to accommodate population-specific differences are required so that at-risk patients are not missed.|
|Source Title:||Singapore Medical Journal|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 22, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 22, 2018
checked on Feb 19, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.