Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty: Patient satisfaction, outcome and quality of life improvement
Authors: Patil, N.
Lee, K. 
Huddleston, J.I.
Harris, A.H.S.
Goodman, S.B.
Keywords: Aseptic
Revision total knee arthroplasty
Issue Date: Jun-2010
Citation: Patil, N., Lee, K., Huddleston, J.I., Harris, A.H.S., Goodman, S.B. (2010-06). Aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty: Patient satisfaction, outcome and quality of life improvement. Knee 17 (3) : 200-203. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: We prospectively compared the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates of aseptic (n=30) versus septic revision TKA (n=15) at a mean follow-up of 40. months. We hypothesized that the clinical results of septic revision TKA would be inferior to aseptic revision TKA. The indication for revision in aseptic group was stiffness in 11 patients, aseptic loosening in 13, patellar loosening or maltracking in 6 patients. Patients operated for infection had better post-operative Knee Society Scores (KSS), Function Scores and SF-36 Mental Scores than aseptic group but there were no significant differences in the satisfaction rates. Patients operated for infection had more improvement in their KSS (p=0.004) and Function Scores (p=0.02) than patients revised for stiffness. Moreover, patients operated on for patellar problems had higher satisfaction rates than patients revised for stiffness (p=0.01) or aseptic loosening (p=0.01). Thus, patients undergoing septic revision TKA had better outcomes compared to those with aseptic revision TKA. However, in the aseptic group, revision TKA for stiffness was associated with the poorest outcomes. The indication for aseptic revision is an important variable when discussing treatment and outcome with patients. © 2009 Elsevier B.V.
Source Title: Knee
ISSN: 09680160
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.09.001
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


checked on Oct 17, 2018


checked on Oct 9, 2018

Page view(s)

checked on Oct 19, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.