Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Addressing Climate Change: Global vs. Local Scales of Jurisdiction?|
|Authors:||Sovacool, B.K. |
|Source:||Sovacool, B.K.,Brown, M.A. (2010). Addressing Climate Change: Global vs. Local Scales of Jurisdiction?. Generating Electricity in a Carbon-Constrained World : 109-124. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-655-2.00005-5|
|Abstract:||This chapter discusses the benefits of local action often emphasized by activists, nongovernmental organizations, and environmental lawyers, and then contrasts their views. It assesses the advantages and disadvantages of tackling climate change through local, bottom-up strategies as well as global, top-down approaches, arguing that each has distinct costs and benefits. The chapter also explores how local and global scales might be integrated into a single and effective policy framework, incorporating the advantages of decentralization and local action along with the advantages of centralized and national action. Actions at local and global scales bring different sets of costs and benefits. Local action fosters diversity, which encourages innovation and experimentation. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Generating Electricity in a Carbon-Constrained World|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jan 16, 2018
checked on Jan 14, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.